Amish made hardwood

It is currently Wed May 15, 2024 6:42 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Waterlox vs Sutherland-Welles Tung Oil
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 11:49 pm 
Offline
New User

Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 11:16 pm
Posts: 2
Location: NYC
In our kitchen renovation, baked French oak 5" planks were installed. We are looking for a rich, old, low-luster and water-resistant finish. No stain is desired.

1- How does one decide between Waterlox sealer+Waterlox Satin versus Sutherland Welles Tung Oil sealer + Tung Oil Finish (low luster or medium luster)?

2- Should a urethane top coat be used over them?

3- Are there better alternatives?

Thanks in advance for your advice.

:?:


Top
 Profile  
 
Amish made hardwood

 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 1:21 am 
Offline
Worthy Contributor

Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 1:32 am
Posts: 299
Location: Yakima, WA
Have U considered Bona Naturale? Low gloss, easy maintenance, and very durable.

_________________
Witty saying goes here.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:08 pm 
Offline
New User

Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 11:16 pm
Posts: 2
Location: NYC
I have begun making inquiries on the Bona product line. It seems using their oil/natural stain followed by 2 to 3 coats of Traffic in satin might give a good and attractive finish.

Thanks for your tip-- any more are most welcome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 1:36 am 
Offline
Worthy Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 4:39 pm
Posts: 408
Location: Burbs of Chicago IL
traiffc satin finish if fairly dull, I would go with that.

_________________
Jay


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 5:29 pm 
Offline
New User

Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 5:14 pm
Posts: 1
This reply might be a little late, but since I didn't see a reply to your original question, I figured I would chime in.

IMO, Sutherland Welles is superior to Waterlox for a number of reasons.

Waterlox uses resins in their "tung oil finish" as well as linseed oil. This means a couple of things: First, it is really not a TRUE tung oil like Sutherland Welles. Waterlox will not penetrate as deep or as well, but rather lie on the surface. Second, linseed oil will not only break down over time, but it will cause the wood to discolor or even blacken where there is a buildup of product. Sutherland Welles tung oil contains no linseed oil or resins.

Sutherland Welles will yield a higher coverage. You'll probably get twice the amount of sqare footage per qt.

Finally, Sutherland Welles has a much lower toxicity than Waterlox, especially if you use their botanical line. Outgassing of solvent based finishes is a huge contributor to indoor air polution. As consumers continue to become more educated you will certainly see a push to lower VOC products. Sutherland Welles uses Di-Citrusol which is much enviornmentally friendlier than what is found in Waterlox.

Good luck


Top
 Profile  
 
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group

phpBB SEO